Suhartawan, Budianto Hasil Cek Plagiasi The Debate of Written Corrective Feedback: What to Do and Where to Go. Unpublished. (Unpublished)
Text
The Debate of Written.pdf Download (2MB) |
Abstract
This article presents the debate of written direct CF (WCF) stated by the previous studies. Being a controversial issue leads written CF into two different positions: that written CF is plausible for ESL and EFL learners [1–8, 15, 17], (Lundstrom & Baker, 2009), [10, 24]. or that it does not contribute significantly for ESL and EFL learners [6, 21]. Through the debate, there are two queries revealed: what to do and where to go. Finally, it can be concluded that an effort to assist learners in improving their accuracy of ESL and EFL writing has to be conducted by a teacher, and CF is one of the alternative techniques among others to make the learning outcome better. Moreover, both local and global aspects are to be checked and treated properly meaning the CF in written form should concern local and global aspects. Later, it would be better to evaluate the long term effect of providing WCF on other occasions (a month or a semester after WCF is given).
Item Type: | Other |
---|---|
Subjects: | A General Works > AI Indexes (General) |
Depositing User: | Dr Budianto Suhartawan |
Date Deposited: | 28 Nov 2019 08:01 |
Last Modified: | 28 Nov 2019 08:01 |
URI: | http://repository.unitomo.ac.id/id/eprint/2037 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |