Reformasi Birokrasi Gagal Mengimplementasikan Kebijakan Bagi Penyandang Cacat: Pendekatan Dan Solusi Alternatif

Mustofa, Amirul (2011) Reformasi Birokrasi Gagal Mengimplementasikan Kebijakan Bagi Penyandang Cacat: Pendekatan Dan Solusi Alternatif. Reformasi Birokrasi Gagal Mengimplementasikan Kebijakan Bagi Penyandang Cacat: Pendekatan Dan Solusi Alternatif, 7 (1). pp. 45-66. ISSN 1907-0489

Preview	Text Reformasi Birokrasi Gagal Mengimplementasikan Kebijakan Bagi Penyandang Cacat- Spirit Publik UNS.pdf Download (558kB) | Preview
Preview	Text cover jurnal spirit publik_Reformasi Birokrasi Gagal Mengimplementasikan Kebijakan Bagi Penyandang Cacat- Spirit Publik UNS_2IN1.pdf Download (644kB) | Preview

Abstract

The number of difable in Indonesia in 2010 reached almost 23 million. However the bureaucracy found less serious in concerning their rights and welfare. Even various problems associated with difable are more likely left without any adequate solution. The implementation of Law Number. 4/ 1997, PP. Number. 43/1998 and SE of Minister of Social Affairs No. A/A164/VIII/2002/MS indicate the failures from the aspects of facilities, equipment, and accessibility. A number of policies tend to forget the equity for all (in particular for difable) as it more orient on economic growth. This situation indicates the sustainability of the existence of mental illness ("schizophrenia"). In facts, refer to a phrase from Chomsky and Asrof Gani - Lockhart, the Indonesian bureaucracy failed in carrying out its functions especially for the welfare of difable. Based on social theory, NPM, NPS, and Management Policy Implementation theory, the alternative solution recommended for the failure of bureaucracy in the implementation of policy for person with disabilities include: 1) there should be no differences between difable and non-difable. In any program, the bureaucracy have to put equivalent position; empower; reduce discriminatory; and classify various kinds of disabilities; 2) Involving communities and stakeholders in the policy formulation and implementation in terms of providing services and institutional strengthening; 3) strengthening the steps in each stage of the implementation task: creating legitimacy; build constituencies, accumulating resources, modifying organizational structures, mobilizing resources and actions, and monitoring the impacts.

Actions (login required)

View Item